|
|
Post by hornet on Feb 6, 2015 14:50:02 GMT -5
Check your departmental email, or hit up a turnout. The smart folks @ 1490 seem to think they can reinvent the wheel, and have now created [yet ANOTHER] new form that is required on ALL arrests. Good luck with some of the questions.
|
|
|
|
Post by newguy on Feb 6, 2015 15:44:00 GMT -5
I love the 2.5 before contacting Ecab. Another attempt to cut ot
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 6, 2015 16:04:39 GMT -5
The way I see it is we will make more OT filling out all this new silly paperwork. Gotta love the bean counters we have running the show!
|
|
|
|
Post by luvinretrmnt on Feb 6, 2015 17:24:08 GMT -5
I love the 2.5 before contacting Ecab. Another attempt to cut ot you mean ecash...lol.that usually adds 2 or more hours to an arrest, and if they make changes.....your rolling in cash...... |
|
shamus
Participating Member
Posts: 47 
|
Post by shamus on Feb 8, 2015 12:28:23 GMT -5
Redundancy in paperwork, what a brilliant idea by our hierarchy.
|
|
|
|
Post by bohica9 on Feb 8, 2015 21:40:02 GMT -5
Back in the day it took 2-3 hours to complete the arrest paperwork by hand.
Then, Swift Justice was invented and it took 4-5 hours to complete the new computerized arrest package.
(Nassau County being the only place on the planet where computerization made things slower)
(This probably having much to do with the, then, recently retired Daniel Lashansky who had been hired to consult)
Then Impact slowed things even more.
It is to my great regret that I retired before the latest debacle, which I have read allows some to "rock around the clock" on even the most simplest arrest. (This after hiring retired PO's and Dets to consult on the project)
I am completely convinced of major incompetence.
A f'ing two year old could run this place better.
But, as always in the County, just follow the money. Watch who is being hired to "consult" or "design" the latest system.
The real answer is so simple.
OT can be cut and the process could be made more efficient.
Don't worry to those still OTJ, I'll never tell.
That is unless they hire me to "consult" at One BILLION dollars....
|
|
tim2188
Full Member
R.I.P Artie Lopez 10/23/12
Posts: 222
|
Post by tim2188 on Feb 10, 2015 20:23:27 GMT -5
Wasn't IMPACT around before SWIFT ?
|
|
|
|
Post by bohica9 on Feb 10, 2015 21:26:07 GMT -5
Wasn't IMPACT around before SWIFT ? You could be correct. It's been awhile. But, you get the point. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2015 21:47:33 GMT -5
I think we had one of them twice.
|
|
tim2188
Full Member
R.I.P Artie Lopez 10/23/12
Posts: 222
|
Post by tim2188 on Feb 10, 2015 21:53:21 GMT -5
I remember IMPACT when I was in the Pct. SWIFT came about after I was in HPB and RMS was good for 8 hrs OT to "learn" how to use it.
|
|
|
|
Post by tywebb on Feb 19, 2015 10:02:45 GMT -5
RMS was the grand slam of overtime. What a complete disaster. And no one swung for that. It has to be the most user unfriendly arrest and records system ever created. I'll never forget the DA I was speaking too. She told me the judge, at arraignment, was so frustrated at reading the court information, because for some reason everything in RMS is capitalized, that he rebuked the Department as incompetent for buying, implementing, using this disgrace of a system. But hey --- It's great for making pretty maps....
|
|
